top of page

Bandera Master Fund v. Boardwalk: Analyzing Valuation Techniques in Damages Assessment

Updated: Aug 2, 2023

The Bandera Master Fund LP v. Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, C.A. 2018-0372-JTL, 2021 Del. Ch. LEXIS 266 (Del. Ch. Nov. 12, 2021) case offers a unique perspective on the application of valuation techniques in a damages assessment, particularly in the context of complex litigation. This article explores the various valuation methods employed in the case, highlighting the strengths, weaknesses, and insights gained from each approach.

In Bandera, the plaintiffs sought damages stemming from alleged breaches of contract and fiduciary duty. The case revolved around the distribution of natural gas, specifically the operation of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP. In response, the defendants claimed that the plaintiffs did not suffer any damages due to the strong performance of Boardwalk's stock price during the relevant time period. As such, the case required analysis of the company's valuation to establish the true extent of any potential damages.

Valuation experts in the case employed various methodologies to assess the damages. These techniques included discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, precedent transaction analysis, and comparable company analysis. Each approach provided unique insights into the value of Boardwalk and the potential damages suffered by the plaintiffs.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis:

The DCF analysis projected the company's future cash flows, discounting them to present value, and determining the company's intrinsic value. In this case, the DCF analysis was instrumental in highlighting the potential discrepancies between the stock price and the true underlying value of the company. The valuation experts considered factors such as growth rates, discount rates, and terminal values to ensure a comprehensive and accurate analysis.

Precedent Transaction Analysis:

The precedent transaction analysis assessed the value of Boardwalk by examining similar transactions in the industry. This technique offered valuable context on the company's relative value compared to its peers, helping to establish whether the plaintiffs suffered damages as a result of the alleged breaches. The valuation experts detailed relevant transaction multiples, deal structures, and synergies to derive a fair comparison.

Comparable Company Analysis:

The comparable company analysis compared Boardwalk's financial metrics with those of similar companies operating in the same industry. This approach provided an external benchmark for evaluating the company's performance and potential damages. By selecting appropriate valuation multiples and adjusting for differences between the companies, the valuation experts were able to provide a reliable assessment of Boardwalk's value.

Each of these valuation techniques offered unique insights into the company's value and potential damages. However, the case also highlighted the importance of considering the specific context of the litigation when selecting and employing valuation methods. In complex litigation, it is crucial for valuation experts to understand the nuances of the case and tailor their analyses accordingly.

For instance, the claims in Bandera involved allegations of breaches in contract and fiduciary duty, which required a thorough understanding of the company's operations, financial performance, and industry trends. Valuation experts must, and in Bandera did, consider these factors when selecting appropriate valuation techniques and when interpreting the results.

Bandera serves as an important reminder of the complexities involved in damages assessment and the critical role that valuation techniques play in the process. By understanding the nuances of each valuation method and applying them in a context-specific manner, valuation professionals can provide accurate and reliable assessments of damages in complex litigation. The case also underscores the need for valuation professionals to stay current with industry trends, legal precedents, and best practices to ensure their analyses withstand scrutiny in the courtroom.

How can Eton help?

Navigating the complexities of business valuation can be challenging, particularly in the context of mergers and acquisitions. Our expert team at Eton Venture Services provides detailed, insightful, and well-documented valuation analyses to support your legal, financial, and strategic decision-making needs. With our extensive experience in the industry, we are well-equipped to provide accurate and reliable valuations that stand up to scrutiny.

Join the industry leaders who have already benefited from Eton's outstanding client service and valuation expertise. Allow our team to guide you through the complexities of M&A valuation and transactional disputes to safeguard your interests and make informed decisions. Contact Eton Venture Services today.


Eton's unparalleled service and expertise can deliver the valuation precision you or your business need

bottom of page